Medical Literature - 2002

Gompels MM, Lock RJ, Morgan JE, Osborne J, Brown A, Virgo PF 2/2002 J.Clin.Pathol.

AIM: To determine the diagnostic efficiency of assays routinely used in the investigation of hereditary angio-oedema. METHODS: Over a four year period, 1144 samples were received for analysis from 907 patients suspected of C1 inhibitor deficiency. Analyses were performed for C4 and C1 inhibitor (functional and immunochemical). Notes were reviewed retrospectively on patients with low serological indicators to determine diagnosis. RESULTS: These are the first data to indicate the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of the assays most frequently used to screen for C1 inhibitor deficiency. A combination of low C4 and low C1 inhibitor function has 98% specificity for C1 inhibitor deficiency in this population and a 96% negative predictive value, and is thus a very effective screen. All patients with untreated C1 inhibitor deficiency had a low C4 value. CONCLUSIONS: All patients considered for a diagnosis of C1 inhibitor deficiency should have serum examined to measure both C4 and functional C1 inhibitor. If either is normal at presentation this essentially excludes a diagnosis of C1 inhibitor deficiency. These tests can be performed sequentially. If C4 is normal it is not necessary to proceed to C1 inhibitor analysis. If C1 inhibitor function and C4 are both low then a repeat sample should be obtained to confirm the findings.

Feb;55(2):145-147

Available online at: ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1769585/

Coppola L, Guastafierro S, Verrazzo G, Coppola A, De Lucia D, Tirelli A 7/2002 Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine (Arch.Pathol.Lab.Med.)

CONTEXT: C1 inhibitor (C1-INH) is an alpha2-globulin that blocks esterolytic activity of the first component of the classic complement cascade. The alpha-granules of normal human platelets also contain C1-INH, which is expressed on the platelet surface during platelet secretion in healthy patients, but it is clearly reduced in patients with hereditary angioedema (HAE).

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of in vivo C1-INH concentrate infusion on platelet responsiveness and coagulation system activity in patients with HAE. DESIGN: Assessment of the platelet activity and plasma levels of C1-INH, activated factor XII (XIIa), and prothrombin fragment F1.2 (F1.2) before and after infusion of 15 U/kg of C1-INH concentrate.

PATIENTS: In 6 patients (4 men and 2 women), HAE was diagnosed according to the accepted clinical and laboratory criteria.

MEASUREMENTS: Platelet aggregation (final concentrations: adenosine diphosphate, 0.5, 1.25, and 2.5 microM; collagen, 5 microg/mL), C1-INH antigen (radial immunodiffusion), C1-INH activity (chromogenic substrates), and XIIa and F1.2 (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay).

RESULTS: After C1-INH infusion, we observed a prompt increase of C1-INH level and a slow return toward its plasma preinfusion values within 4 to 7 days, a significant decrease of both adenosine diphosphate- and collagen-induced platelet aggregation versus preinfusion values (maximum after 1-2 days; P <.001), and a rapid decrease of high basal values of XIIa and F1.2 in 30 and 120 minutes, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: These data show a role of C1-INH in the control of platelet activity and that its deficiency increases platelet aggregability and plasma levels of XIIa and F1.2 in patients with HAE.

Jul;126(7):842-845

Available online at: archivesofpathology.org/doi/full/10.1043/0003-9985%282002%29126%3C0842%3ACIIMPA%3E2.0.CO%3B2

Farkas H, Harmat G, Fust G, Varga L, Visy B 6/2002 Pediatric Allergy & Immunology

Hereditary angio-oedema (HAE) results from the deficiency of C1-esterase inhibitor (C1-INH). The clinical picture of this autosomal dominant disorder is characterized by recurrent attacks of subcutaneous oedema and/or potentially life-threatening swelling of the submucosa. This review discusses the authors’ decade-long experience obtained in the treatment and follow-up of pediatric patients with HAE. Twenty-six children with HAE were reviewed. Pedigree analysis was performed in all cases to identify afflicted relatives. C1-INH concentrate was reserved for the emergency treatment of acute oedematous attacks, whereas tranexamic acid and danazol were administered for short- or long-term prophylaxis. Follow-up care included laboratory tests and abdominal ultrasound, which was repeated at regular intervals. Twenty-one children had Type I HAE and five suffered from Type II HAE. Clinical manifestations of the disease first occured in children when 2.5-12 years of age. Oedema formation primarily afflicted subcutaneous tissues. Mechanical trauma was identified as a precipitating factor in 20 patients. Pedigree analysis revealed 24 patients with relatives who suffered from HAE. Long-term prophylaxis with tranexamic acid or danazol was initiated in 11 patients; two children required short-term prophylaxis. No drug-related adverse effects were observed, except for one case of delayed menarche. Therapy improved serum complement parameters significantly and substantially reduced the frequency and severity of clinical episodes. Adequate prophylaxis and follow-up care can spare pediatric patients from oedematous attacks caused by HAE. Undesirable adverse effects can be avoided and the patient’s quality of life enhanced considerably by administering the lowest effective drug dose. [References: 30].

Jun;13(3):153-161

Available online at: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1034/j.1399-3038.2002.01014.x/full (small fee)

Fay A, Abinun M 4/2002 J.Clin.Pathol.

Hereditary angio-oedema is characterised by recurrent swellings in any part of the body and also by recurrent attacks of severe abdominal pain. The disease is inherited in an autosomal dominant manner but up to 25% of cases can occur as a spontaneous mutation. Attacks of swelling can be precipitated by trauma, certain drugs, and emotional stress. Treatment usually involves a combination of prophylaxis, using androgens or antifibrolytic drugs, and replacement with C’1 esterase inhibitor concentrate for acute attacks and before surgery or other traumatic procedures. [References: 106].

Apr;55(4):266-270

Available online at: ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1769636/

Weiler JM, Quinn SA, Woodworth GG, Brown DD, Layton TA, Maves KK 6/2002 Journal of Allergy & Clinical Immunology

BACKGROUND: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare disorder characterized by episodes of angioedema of the skin, mucous membranes, and gastrointestinal tract resulting from a defect in the gene that produces C1 esterase inhibitor. Although in vitro laboratory data and past reports suggested that heparin might be efficacious in preventing HAE attacks, no controlled study has been reported to examine heparin’s efficacy in this regard.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the safety and efficacy of inhaled and subcutaneous heparin versus that of placebo in the prevention of HAE attacks.

METHODS: We performed a double-blind, double-dummy, saline placebo-controlled, randomized, 3-way crossover study with 11 visits.

RESULTS: The study was designed to enroll 24 patients. Twenty-two patients were randomized and received the study drug. Patients did not have a significant decrease in average flare intensity after they received injected or inhaled heparin compared with that seen after placebo, the primary endpoint. However, when patients received injected heparin, they had a statistically significant decrease in average flare intensity compared with that seen with inhaled heparin after a normalizing transformation was applied. When the means are back transformed, this translates into median flare intensities of 9.2, 8.0, and 5.1 in the patients treated with inhaled heparin, placebo, and injected heparin, respectively. There were no significant differences when individual symptoms were examined, when total numbers of flares over a 6-week observation period were examined, or when global evaluations by the patients and investigators were evaluated. Adverse event severity was fairly uniform across treatments, with the majority of events classified as moderate and the remainder split between mild and severe. Injected heparin treatment was associated with higher rates of relatedness than other treatments, which was partially explained by 17 adverse events specifically related to the injection process itself (tenderness, bruising, redness, pain, and itching at the injection site). The injection treatment was also associated with a larger overall number of reported adverse events (70 vs 48 in the placebo treatment). Tenderness and bruising at the injection site were entirely confined to the injected heparin treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Injected and inhaled heparin failed to attenuate average flare intensity, the primary endpoint, compared with placebo. Interestingly, after patients injected heparin, they had a significant decrease in average flare intensity compared with that seen after inhalation of heparin. There were no differences among groups in other efficacy parameters. Taken together, these data indicate that commercial heparin was ineffective in preventing exacerbations of HAE.

Jun;109(6):995-1000

Available online at: jacionline.org/article/S0091-6749%2802%2900014-3/fulltext